Legal Opinion

Sexton v. Balinski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1937No. Docket No. 5, Calendar No. 39,314PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendants for $5,000 damages for injuries sustained while a pedestrian by being struck by an automobile. Defendant Zuck alone appeals.

Plaintiff was injured by being struck by an Oldsmobile and appellant’s liability depends upon whether he was the owner thereof at the time plaintiff was injured. At the trial, a police officer was permitted to testify, against appellant’s objection, to what"' defendant Kozakiewicz said at the police station after the accident about appellant owning the automobile. The police officer, Fred Wilkinson, stated defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Saginaw-Bay City Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bernard v. Grand Rapids Paper Box Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. McAvon v. Brightmoor Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Holtz v. L. J. Beal & Son, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. People v. HarrisonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. People v. GriffinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Escott v. LockeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API