People ex rel. Board of Education v. Treasurer of Wayne County
Michigan Supreme Court
Motion for a mandamus. The relators had appEecL by petition, and an order had been made that the resjwndent show cause this day.
1Opinion of the Court
Campbell J.:
A mandamus is applied for, to compel the respondent to pay over to the Board of Education their share of moneys in his hands received from fines and recognizances. The question submitted is, whether the amounts paid in to Mm from those sources are liable to any deductions for expenses, either attending the collection of the particular sums paid in, or embracing the general criminal expenses of the county.
*393The present Constitution, Art. 18, § 12, declares that “The Legislature shall also provide for the establishment of at least one library in each township; and all fines assessed…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Dennis v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
- Board of Library Commissioners v. Judges of the 70th District CourtMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Riggs v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Gunn v. Mahaska CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- State ex rel. Guenther v. MilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.