Gunn v. Mahaska County
Supreme Court of Iowa
'Appeal from Mahaska District Court. — Hon. K. E. ,Wii ■Action to recover stipulated percentage of fines collected resulted in the dismissal of the petition. The plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The plaintiff addressed the following proposition to the board of supervisors of Mahaska county: “I agree to collect the fines and costs due the county in the justice and mayor’s courts and the district courts in and for Mahaska county, and agree to accept in full compensation 33 1-3 percent of the amount paid in to the *529county treasurer of said fines and costs. This agreement to be in full force and effect for the period of two years from its acceptance.” Acceptance was indorsed thereon, each member signing same, in February, 1910, and it was filed with the county auditor together with a bond…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Frederick v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Galusha v. WendtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Katzenstein v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Southern Express Co. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Pennsylvania Co. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bearden v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Lemke v. MuellerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Dawson v. SiskSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Preston v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Story County v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.