Legal Opinion
City of Thornton v. Replogle
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 17, 1995No. 94SC66Published
1Opinion of the Court
888 P.2d 782 (1995)
CITY OF THORNTON and CIRSA, Petitioners,
v.
Kent REPLOGLE and Industrial Claim Appeals Office, Respondents.
No. 94SC66.
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
January 17, 1995.
Watson, Nathan & Bremer, P.C., Anne Smith Myers, Andrew J. Fisher, Denver, for petitioners.
Brauer, Buescher, Valentine, Goldhammer & Kelman, P.C., Dennis E. Valentine, Ellen M. Kelman, Denver, for respondent Kent Replogle.
Industrial Claim Appeals Office, Dona Halsey, Denver, for respondent Indus. Claim Appeals Office.
Justice MULLARKEY delivered the Opinion of the Court.
We granted the petition for certiorari…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. TerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Griffin v. SW Devanney & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Moody v. CorsentinoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- A.B. Hirschfeld Press, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Duran v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.