Estop v. HSBC Bank USA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 22-cv-24012-ALTMAN ANDREW ESTOP, Plaintiff, v. HSBC BANK USA, Defendant. ____________________________/ ORDER Because the Plaintiff has moved to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 3], we’ve screened his Complaint [ECF No. 1] under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). But the Plaintiff has failed to establish that we can exercise subject-matter jurisdiction over this case. And, even if we did have jurisdiction, we’d find that the Plaintiff failed to state a plausible claim. We therefore DISMISS the Complaint without prejudice.…