Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of Iowa

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 1, 1989No. 87-1490Published

1Dissent

Justice Stevens, with whom Justice Marshall, Justice Blackmun, and Justice O’Connor join,

dissenting.

The relationship between a court and the members of its bar is not defined by statute alone. The duties of the practitioner are an amalgam of tradition, respect for the profession, the inherent power of the judiciary, and the commands that are set forth in canons of ethics, rules of court, and legislative enactments. This case involves much more than the parsing of the plain meaning of the word “request” as used in 28 U. S. C. § 1915(d). This case also does not concern the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Supreme Court of NH v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Frazier v. HeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API