Bickel v. Dutcher
Nebraska Supreme Court
Motion by appellants to require appellees to supply certain exhibits used in the court below, which were not made a part of the bill of exceptions, and motion by appellees to dismiss appeal from the decree of the district court for Douglas county.
1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.
This is an appeal by the defendants Galligher and wife from a decree of the district court of Douglas county fore*762closing certain mortgages and mechanics’ liens, and for the sale of the property in controversy in satisfaction thereof. The questions submitted for consideration at this time are presented by the motion of appellants to require appellees to supply certain exhibits which they allege were introduced in evidence before the district court and which are not included in the bill of exceptions filed in this court, and the motion of appellees to dismiss the appeal for the reason that it…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Haseltine v. SimpsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Humphrey v. HavensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864
- Horn v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kennedy v. Citizens' National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Marcotte v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
- Ward v. UrmsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Sloan v. GibsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Continental Building & Loan Ass'n v. MillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.