Humphrey v. Havens
Supreme Court of Minnesota
APPEAL EROM THE DISTRICT COURT OE RAMSEY COUNTY. Points and authorities of Appellants. I. — The Court erred in -excluding certain testimony offered by the Plaintiffs upon the trial, and also in receiving certain testimony offered by the Defendant Havens, under objections from the Plaintiffs’ counsel.
Read the full summary
APPEAL EROM THE DISTRICT COURT OE RAMSEY COUNTY. Points and authorities of Appellants. I. — The Court erred in -excluding certain testimony offered by the Plaintiffs upon the trial, and also in receiving certain testimony offered by the Defendant Havens, under objections from the Plaintiffs’ counsel. First — The Court erred in excluding the testimony of J. P. Pond and A. M. Torbett, respecting the statements and declarations of Harriet E. Bishop (now Mrs. McConkey,) in relation to the purchase of the Kinney, lots, and for whom the same were purchased, contained in folios 14 to 18, and folios…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court
Emmett, C. J.
'There appear to be three distinct cases on the calendar at this term, between these same .parties, all, however, arising out of the single action heard and decided in the Court below, and which are accounted for as follows: It appears that the Plaintiffs first appealed from the judgment or decree rendered against them; but subsequently claiming to have discovered new evidence material to the issues, they moved on that ground for a new trial, and, the motion being denied, they again *350appealed from tbe order denying tbe same. Afterwards, it being found that tbe appeal…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Furlong v. Griffin & FullertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1859
3Cited by9 opinions
- Callanan v. VotrubaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Thompson v. BickfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Bickel v. DutcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- In re McCallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
- Hostetter v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.