Bruntfield v. Ridge Tool Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVING BEN COOPER, District Judge.
Movant Emerson Electric Company, Inc. (Emerson) seeks an order, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, dismissing the complaint against it on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and consequently it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. For reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in all respects.
Respondents, John and Rose Bruntfield, commenced this diversity action 1 on December 24,1981 against Emerson and Ridge Tool Co., Inc. (Ridge) for injuries sustained by John Bruntfield while he was operating a pipe cutting…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spence v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1992
- Sterling v. Interlake Industries Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994