Stanley v. Darlington County School District
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
CURRIE, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
On June 3, 1994, the parties entered into a Consent Order stipulating, among other things, that Mayo High School was a racially identifiable school and a vestige of the prior dual school system in the Darlington County School District and that remedial measures were needed. Consent Order at 2 (6/3/94). Under the Consent Order, Mayo and St. John’s High Schools were to be consolidated on the St. John’s campus into Darlington High School beginning with the 1995-96 school year. After a two-week trial on the question…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fullilove v. KlutznickSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ho by Ho v. San Francisco Unified School Dist.District Court, N.D. California · 1997