Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Darlington County School District

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided February 22, 1996No. Civil A. 4:62-7749-22PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

CURRIE, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

On June 3, 1994, the parties entered into a Consent Order stipulating, among other things, that Mayo High School was a racially identifiable school and a vestige of the prior dual school system in the Darlington County School District and that remedial measures were needed. Consent Order at 2 (6/3/94). Under the Consent Order, Mayo and St. John’s High Schools were to be consolidated on the St. John’s campus into Darlington High School beginning with the 1995-96 school year. After a two-week trial on the question…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Fullilove v. KlutznickSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ho by Ho v. San Francisco Unified School Dist.District Court, N.D. California · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API