Legal Opinion
Ho by Ho v. San Francisco Unified School Dist.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 5, 1997No. C-94-2418 WHOPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORRICK, District Judge.
The Consent Decree entered on April 30, 1983, in San Francisco NAACP v. San Francisco Unified School District, No. C-78-1445 WHO, to end segregation in the San Francisco Unified School District (“SFUSD”) provides, in paragraph 13, that of the nine racial or ethnic groups of which the student population was composed in 1983, 1 no fewer than four are to be represented in any school’s student body, with no racial/ethnic group permitted to constitute more than 45 percent (40 percent at any “alternative school”) of the school’s total enrollment.
Named plaintiffs Brian…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- William Leer Robert Larry Emerhiser v. Al Murphy Darrell Gardner Arvin AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rowe v. Grapevine Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
- Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration & Immigrant Rights & Fight for Equality by Any Means Necessary v. Regents of the UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration & Immigrant Rights & Fight for Equality by Any Means Necessary v. Regents of the UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- San Francisco NAACP v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005