Mount v. Chapman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, County of Napa. A statement of the facts appears in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
On the fourteenth day of "March, 1854, the defendant executed a note and mortgage for six hundred dollars, to Henry Murphy, due on the first day of December following, and drawing interest from date at the rate of two and one-half per cent, per month. On the tenth day of May, 1856, Murphy assigned the note and mortgage to plaintiff. This suit was brought to foreclose the mortgage. The defendant plead payment and set-off. The plaintiff had judgment, and the defendant appealed.
The first material point made by the defendant’s counsel is that the Court below erred in not allowing the defendant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Guy v. FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- Emeric v. TamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reynolds v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Raun v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Corcoran v. DollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867