Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 20, 2006No. 9910-11479; A128598PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Plaintiff Jose Gonzales appeals, assigning error to the allowance of summary judgment in favor of defendants, various Farmers Insurance-related companies. The only issue presented is whether, under the terms of his automobile coverage with defendant, plaintiff is entitled to recover payment for his vehicle’s “inherent diminished value” (IDV) following a collision. Specifically, is plaintiff entitled, in addition to payment for the cost of repair to the vehicle, to recover for the difference in his vehicle’s fair market value before and after the collision? The trial court determined that a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Totten v. New York Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MabrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  5. I-L Logging Co. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Roberts v. GallagherDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API