Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Harris

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided June 5, 1997No. 97-3048PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:

With 2 $ hours left in his 1-year probationary period as a Springfield police officer, Plaintiff was discharged.

He now alleges that Defendants violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

But the Due Process Clause only applies if Defendants deprived Plaintiff of property, and employment as a probationary police officer is not property.

I. BACKGROUND1

Paul Lewis began working for the Springfield, Illinois Police Department (SPD) on May 22, 1995. According to city regulations, Lewis’ first year as a patrol officer was a period of probation. The…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lawlor v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API