Lewis v. Harris
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:
With 2 $ hours left in his 1-year probationary period as a Springfield police officer, Plaintiff was discharged.
He now alleges that Defendants violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
But the Due Process Clause only applies if Defendants deprived Plaintiff of property, and employment as a probationary police officer is not property.
I. BACKGROUND1
Paul Lewis began working for the Springfield, Illinois Police Department (SPD) on May 22, 1995. According to city regulations, Lewis’ first year as a patrol officer was a period of probation. The…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lawlor v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018