Legal Opinion

Winn v. Harby

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 13, 1933No. 13714PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice; Bonham.

From the statement agreed upon for the hearing of the appeal, in this case, and the pleadings, we gather the following narrative of the origin and progress of the litigation.

D. James Winn, of Sumter, died in 1921, leaving of force his will by which he appointed the Sumter Trust Company, a banking corporation, executor of his will and trustee of his estate for the purposes therein stated. The trust company accepted the offices of executor and trustee and duly qualified. The trust company, as we shall call it, suspended business and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Killen v. BarnesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Browne v. HammettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Delano v. CaseIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Stewart v. FickenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Marchant v. WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. Beacham v. RossSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  3. Proksch v. BettendorfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  4. Bowen v. StraussSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  5. Monteith v. HarbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API