Legal Opinion

Marchant v. Wannamaker

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 29, 1935No. 14032PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. C. J. Ramage, Acting Associate Justice.

The facts underlying this appeal are that prior to the 9th day of January, 1931, the Edisto National Bank of Orange-burg had conducted under the national banking laws a bank at Orangeburg, S. C., and as a part of its operation had conducted a trust department. On that date, Mrs. Carrie E. Wannamaker, now deceased, entered into a written trust agreement with said bank, and by virtue of said agreement deposited the sum of $5,000.00 “to be held, managed, controlled, and invested through its trust department.” The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  4. Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Cook County National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BinderOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Liberty Title & Trust Co. v. PlewsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Sparrow v. NERZIGSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. City of Orangeburg v. Southern Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1942
  5. Collins v. CollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API