Legal Opinion

Consumers Grain Co. v. Wm. Lindeke Roller Mills

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 13, 1922No. 22,902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $2,628.41 for breach of contract. The answer denied that defendant ever agreed to a modification of the agreement of May 6, 1920. The case was tried before Gatlin, J., who at the close of the testimony granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. From an order denying its motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Action for damages for the alleged breach of a contract in which at the conclusion of the trial a verdict was directed for defendant and plaintiff appealed - from an order denying a new trial.

The facts as stated and disclosed by the complaint are substantially as follows: On May 6, 1920, the parties to the action entered into a contract by which plaintiff sold and agreed to deliver to defendant 5,000 bushels of number 2 hard winter wheat at a stated price per bushel. No definite time was fixed for the delivery, but the complaint alleges that a part thereof was delivered and paid for in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cremer v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Ecker v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Marshall v. GilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Burns v. Fidelity Real-Estate Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Basich v. Board of PensionsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Cohoon v. Lake Region Produce Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Hoppman v. PershaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. State Ex Rel. Gay v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API