State v. De Lea

Prank De Lea was convicted of the crime of grand larceny and appeals from the judgment.

I. Objections are made to the proceedings in the case. It is said the court erred:

“ (a) In not causing a copy of the indorsements upon the information, including the list of witnesses, to be delivered to the defendant at the time of his arraignment.

“ (b) In permitting the verdict to be filed without having the names of the jurors first called by the clerk.

“ (c) In receiving the verdict in the absence of the defendant.” These objections must be answered, if at all, by the record.(a) The minutes of the trial…