Legal Opinion

Akridge v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 28, 2007No. 2D06-2610PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FULMER, Judge.

Dianna Akridge appeals her convictions for possession of cocaine, possession of drug paraphernalia, and giving false identification to a law enforcement officer. Akridge raises four issues in this appeal. We find merit only in her contention that the trial court erred in ruling that identity would not be an issue in the case, thus prohibiting the State from presenting evidence of the accused’s identity.

A jury trial commenced on May 8, 2006, at which time the jury was selected and sworn, and the trial was continued until May 10. Akridge did not appear on May 10, but the trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. JohnstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. People v. StanleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. State v. AhlquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  2. State v. PloofSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  3. K. T. B. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. VINCENT CLARENCE NEWTON, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API