Legal Opinion

People v. Stanley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 14, 1983No. 4-82-0451PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills

“The lion growled.”

The trial judge said no more continuances, “*** the court’s business requires it to proceed to trial.”

Trial in absentia.

Guilty.

We affirm.

Stanley was charged with theft with a prior conviction. He did not appear on his original trial date and his case was continued for one week. When Stanley again failed to appear, he was tried in absentia. The jury returned a guilty verdict; judgment was entered; and Stanley was sentenced — m absentia— to three years’ imprisonment.

On appeal, he contends: His identity as the accused was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt; trial in absentia…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. HousbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. LottIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. The PEOPLE v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. JohnstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. People v. BroyldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. People v. JarnaganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. People v. HallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API