Legal Opinion

Schmitt v. Emery

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1943No. 33,426PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This action was brought by plaintiff as the personal representative of her deceased husband. The complaint sets forth two causes of action, one for the wrongful death of decedent and the other for damages to his personal property. Judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendants on the cause of action for wrongful death was granted. The only question on the appeal is whether the court erred in granting the judgment.

It appears that any recovery for wrongful death would be for plaintiff’s benefit as decedent’s sole heir at law and for payment of the funeral expenses. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Keith v. Willers Truck ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Schmitt v. EmerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. McKay v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Gibson v. SolomonOhio Supreme Court · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lustik v. RankilaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Lee v. ArrowoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. In Re Estate of BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Stout v. AMCO Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Pehrson v. KistnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API