Janovich v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 TIMOTHY P. JANOVICH, 11 Plaintiff. No. 2:21-cv-00402-TLN-KJN 12 v. 13 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ORDER 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“Defendant”) 19 Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff Timothy P. Janovich (“Plaintiff”) opposed the motion. 20 (ECF No. 6.) Defendant replied. (ECF No. 10.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court 21 GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant’s motion. (ECF No. 5.) 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.