Morris v. Resnick

Counsel for plaintiff contends on this appeal: (1) That the finding of the trial court that no partnership was created between plaintiff and Sarah Eskin, the deceased, is against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence; (2) that such determination was grounded upon an erroneous view of the law; and (3) if these contentions are decided adversely to plaintiff, then that the undisputed evidence requires that the. value of the services rendered by the plaintiff for the deceased be fixed at a higher figure than the sum of $3,700 found by the trial court.

At the time of trial in…