Legal Opinion

Hames v. Philadelphia Housing Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1997No. 1415 CD 1996PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Appellants, Venice Hames, Venicia Hames, a minor, and Kiara Hames, a minor, appeal from the May 2, 1996 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County that denied their motion for reconsideration, reinstated the November 3, 1995 order granting summary judgment to the Philadelphia Housing Authority (Appellee) and dismissed the Appellants’ claims based on Venicia and Kiara’s psychiatric injuries. The trial court determined that Appellants failed to submit additional medical evidence to establish that Venicia and Kiara’s alleged physical and resulting psychiatric injuries…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allwein v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Murray v. McCannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Curley v. Board of School Directors of the Greater Johnstown School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Moscatiello Construction Co. v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Wolfe ex rel. Wolfe v. Stroudsburg Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Holland v. MarcySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Hobbs v. RyceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Hames Ex Rel. Hames v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Andreyo v. Radle, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County2002
  5. Cordaro v. Hedderick, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API