Hobbs v. Ryce
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, J.:
¶ 1 We decide, inter alia, whether a parent’s limited tort election applies to a minor residing with his parents, and whether the trial court properly applied sections 1711(a) and 1722 of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL) to reduce a verdict for medical expenses to zero.
¶ 2 This action involved a motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff Robert Hobbs, who at the time of the accident was sixteen years old and living with his parents, sued for personal injuries. Hobbs was a passenger sitting in the rear of a vehicle driven by defendant Kevin Ryce. Ryce…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Kiser v. SchulteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Washington v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Washington v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Criswell v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Stapas, J. v. Giant Eagle, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Pentarek v. ChristySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Ganley, J. v. Robertson, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.