State v. Eason
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtEich, J.
¶ 1. The State of Wisconsin appeals from an order suppressing evidence seized by police while executing a no-knock search warrant at an apartment occupied by the defendant, Rayshun Eason, and various other people. The trial court suppressed the evidence on grounds that the search warrant affidavit failed to justify a no-knock search. The State argues on appeal that the affidavit was sufficient and, even if it were not, we should still reverse the suppression order because: (1) there was no causal relationship between the officers' no-knock entry into the apartment and discovery of the seized…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hoyer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. EasonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Jorgensen v. Water Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- State v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.