Legal Opinion
Braunstein v. Pickens
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided January 20, 2009No. 4:08-cr-00193Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, construed by this court as a Rule 12 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs have also filed a Motion to Amend. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is denied, and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend is granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs were all investors who invested various substantial sums of money with Defendant Thomas B. Pickens, III…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Stan Laber v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Johnson v. Oroweat Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.