Legal Opinion · Concurrence
City Of Kent v. Bel Air & Briney
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 14, 2015No. 71544-5-IPublished
1ConcurrenceCox, J.
(concurring) —
¶33 I concur. I write separately to address additional aspects of the City’s attempt to clear title to its property by use of a sheriff’s sale. Namely, the City seeks to extinguish the subordinate deed of trust held by Bel Air & Briney that encumbers the property.
¶34 The trial court’s amended judgment ordering foreclosure states that
“upon completion of such Sheriff’s Sale, Bel Air & Briney’s Lien upon the Property shall be extinguished and Bel Air & Briney, and any and all persons claiming by, through, or under them, shall be forever barred and foreclosed from any right, title,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gill v. StroufWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Ensberg v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013