Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City Of Kent v. Bel Air & Briney

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 14, 2015No. 71544-5-IPublished

1ConcurrenceCox, J.

(concurring) —

¶33 I concur. I write separately to address additional aspects of the City’s attempt to clear title to its property by use of a sheriff’s sale. Namely, the City seeks to extinguish the subordinate deed of trust held by Bel Air & Briney that encumbers the property.

¶34 The trial court’s amended judgment ordering foreclosure states that

“upon completion of such Sheriff’s Sale, Bel Air & Briney’s Lien upon the Property shall be extinguished and Bel Air & Briney, and any and all persons claiming by, through, or under them, shall be forever barred and foreclosed from any right, title,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gill v. StroufWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Ensberg v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API