Legal Opinion

Risch v. Paul J. Krez Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 14, 1997No. 1—95—0444, 1—95—0446 consPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis

Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs brought suit against the Paul J. Krez Company and others to recover damages for the wrongful deaths of their husbands. Plaintiffs alleged that their husbands’ deaths were the result of exposure to asbestos products designed, processed, manufactured, sold, and distributed by Krez. Krez filed a motion for summary judgment, claiming that the construction design management and supervision statute of repose (construction statute of repose) barred plaintiffs’ action. 735 ILCS 5/13—214 (West 1992).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blaske v. Smith & Entzeroth, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. People Ex Rel. Skinner v. Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,316 Robert Witham and Patricia Witham v. Whiting Corporation and Wt/hrc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. People v. Asbestospray Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Adcock v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Boldini v. Owens CorningAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. Ryan v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. Beetle v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. Beetle v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Stanley v. Ameren Illinois Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API