Legal Opinion

People v. Asbestospray Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 8, 1993No. 4-92-0441PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE STEIGMANN

delivered the opinion of the court:

In October 1991, the trial court dismissed the State’s action for damages against two foreign corporations based on the time bar of section 13 — 213(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) and the time bar and substantive provisions of section 13 — 214(b) of the Code. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 110, pars. 13—213(b), 13 — 214(b).) The State appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in concluding (1) the State was not immune from the “repose” provisions contained in those sections of the Code, and (2) an asbestos manufacturer was…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Dollar Savings Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Rosenberg v. Town of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  4. United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. County of Du Page v. Graham, Anderson, Probst & White, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Roark v. MacOupin Creek Drainage DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,994 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. W.R. Grace & Company-Conn.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Krueger v. A.P. Green Refractories Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Risch v. Paul J. Krez Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API