Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Commonwealth Edison Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 28, 2008No. 1-06-3309PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Joseph Gordon

Electrician Daniel Ryan was injured in an on-the-job circuit breaker explosion. He brought suit against Commonwealth Edison Company (Com Ed), alleging that Com Ed was responsible for the electrical current that flowed into the building and that the severity of the accident was increased by Com Ed’s negligent failure to adequately perform its ongoing maintenance duties. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Com Ed on grounds that Ryan’s claim was time-barred by the construction statute of repose, since it occurred more than 10 years after the electrical system was first…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Merlo v. Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Skinner v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. General Casualty Insurance v. LaceyIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People Ex Rel. Skinner v. Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Eskew v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. Stanley v. Ameren Illinois Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  3. Eskew v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FEAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Federal Insurance v. Konstant Architecture Planning, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. Michigan Indiana Condominium Ass'n v. Michigan Place, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API