Legal Opinion
Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. Cordis Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 15, 2009No. 2008-1073PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Cordis Corporation and Johnson & Johnson, Inc. (collectively “Cordis”) appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware denying a motion for a new trial and judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) following a jury verdict of infringement of claim 8 of U.S. Patent 6,120,536 (“the '536 patent”). See Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. Cordis Corp., No. 03-283-SLR, 2005 WL 1322946, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10735 (D.Del. June 3, 2005) (“Claim Construction Opinion ”); Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. Cordis Corp., 434 F.Supp.2d 308…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Muniauction, Inc. v. Thomson Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Mobilemedia Ideas LLC v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Western Union Co. v. MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.