Legal Opinion

State v. Roark

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 2004No. 29826PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Chief Judge.

Clinton Ray Roark appeals from his judgment of conviction for trafficking in methamphetamine, entered upon his conditional guilty plea. Roark contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence found when Roark was subjected to a pat-down search following a traffic stop. We affirm.

I

BACKGROUND

According to the findings made by the district court on Roark’s suppression motion, the pertinent facts are as follows. Roark was driving alone in his pickup when Officer Lee of the Idaho State Police stopped Roark because the pickup did not have the mud…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. State v. GutierrezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State v. AgundisIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. State v. HenageIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. GranthamIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. RamirezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Michael Scott Tibbetts v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API