Legal Opinion
State v. Grantham
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided October 30, 2008No. 32657PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge.
Eddy Max Grantham appeals from his judgment of conviction for trafficking in a controlled substance, methamphetamine. He argues that several errors occurred below, including the denial of his motion to suppress evidence and the denial of his motion for a mistrial. He also contends that prosecutorial misconduct occurred during the trial and that the court erred by giving an erroneous jury instruction. He asserts that these errors, individually and cumulatively, necessitate reversal. We affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
On January 13, 2005, Grantham was a passenger in an Isuzu pickup…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ballard v. Kerr, M.D, Silk Touch LaserIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. WatkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. Kenneth Randall SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. KeyesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
- Ballard v. Kerr, M.D, Silk Touch LaserIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.