Legal Opinion

Michael Scott Tibbetts v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2017No. S-16-0134PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUTZ, Justice.

[¶1] The Appellant, Michael Scott Tibbetts, appeals his conviction for possession of methamphetamine with the intent to distribute. Mr. Tibbetts’ appeal comes after he entered a conditional no contest plea to the charge, reserving the right to challenge the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.

ISSUE

[¶2] Mr. Tibbetts raises one issue in this appeal:

Did the district court err in its finding of fact that [Mr. Tibbetts] consented to continued detention when law enforcement told him “he was free to leave” and law enforcement continued to have [its] red…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. O'BOYLE v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Bryan Robinson v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Pier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  4. People v. Arebalos-Cabrera, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Michael Scott Tibbetts v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API