Legal Opinion

Bounds v. Travelers Insurance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 5, 1967No. 5-4237PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gteoege Eose Smith, Justice.

This case is a sequel to Reynolds v. Bounds, 238 Ark. 610, 383 S. W. 2d 496 (1964), where the facts are fully stated. In the present case the trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Travelers Insurance Company, on the theory that in the earlier case the controlling issue of fact had been established adversely to the appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Bounds. We agree with that conclusion.

John H. Davidson operated a service station in El Dorado. On August 12, 1961, Cordon Smith, an employee of Eeynolds & Williams Contractors & Construction Company,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  2. Travelers Ins. Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Frisby v. HurleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Reynolds v. BoundsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Massoth v. StaplesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  2. Russell v. Nekoosa Papers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Continental Insurance Company v. ThompsonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1972
  4. Debra Kay Henson v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. North East Insurance v. Woodside Auto Painting, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API