Legal Opinion

Isaacson v. Starrett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1909No. 8187PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered December 2, 1908, upon findings in favor of - the plaintiff, after- a trial before the court without a jury, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Action to recover damages for failure to deliver a gas engine within the time provided for in the contract of purchase. The complaint alleged that, on January 16, 1906, the parties hereto entered into a parol contract, whereby appellant agreed to deliver to respondent, within sixty days, a thirty-horse power, standard gas engine, for the price of $1,625, of which sum $825 was paid in cash, and the balance was to be paid upon delivery. No delivery being made, action was commenced in April, 1907, to recover damages for the breach. Appellant admitted the sale of the engine, but denied any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. School District No. 1 v. DauchySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
  2. Summers v. Hibbard, Spencer, Bartlett & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Anderson v. MaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Reichenbach v. SageWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farmers Grain & Supply Co. v. LemleyWashington Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API