Legal Opinion

Stokely v. Owens

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 7, 1949No. Record No. 3438PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStaples, J.

In this case we are met at the threshold with a motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal on the ground that reasonable notice was not given to them, or their attorney,, of the time and place at which the certificate of the proceedings in the case would be tendered to the judge for his signature. The. evidence, which was heard by the chancellor ore tenus, is embraced in the certificate.

The appellants adopted the method of certifying the proceedings prescribed by Rule 21 of this court. Such certificates are required by the rule to be tendered for the judge’s signature and to be signed by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schwarzschild v. WelborneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  2. Kornegay v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  3. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. HaleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meagher v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  2. Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API