Swift v. Seidler

OPINION

PAUL W. GREEN, Justice.

David M. Swift appeals the trial court’s order rendering summary judgment for Martin W. Seidler. Whether Swift complied with the statute of limitations was the sole issue before the trial court in this attorney malpractice case. On appeal, Swift argues the trial court incorrectly calculated the limitations period, which he contends did not begin to ran until all appeals had been exhausted in the cause of action underlying the malpractice suit. Because the record shows Swift became aware of a possible cause of action against Seidler more than two years before he…