Hamilburg v. Meffert
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
The defendants were stockbrokers doing business under the name of Clark, Childs and Company with offices in Boston and New York. The plaintiff was a margin customer of the defendants. This action is brought to *457recover a balance to the credit of the plaintiff in his account with the defendants. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The only issue now raised turns upon the attempt of the defendants to charge the plaintiff’s account with a substantial loss which resulted from the plaintiff being “short” two hundred shares of “Westinghouse.” The plaintiff contends that he would not have been…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harris v. . TumbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Doe v. Boston & Worcester Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Cronin v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Spicer v. HincksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Hamilton v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- O'Connor v. Benson Coal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938