Legal Opinion

Hamilburg v. Meffert

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 29, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The defendants were stockbrokers doing business under the name of Clark, Childs and Company with offices in Boston and New York. The plaintiff was a margin customer of the defendants. This action is brought to *457recover a balance to the credit of the plaintiff in his account with the defendants. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The only issue now raised turns upon the attempt of the defendants to charge the plaintiff’s account with a substantial loss which resulted from the plaintiff being “short” two hundred shares of “Westinghouse.” The plaintiff contends that he would not have been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harris v. . TumbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Doe v. Boston & Worcester Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Cronin v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. Spicer v. HincksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  5. Hamilton v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Connor v. Benson Coal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API