Spicer v. Hincks
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The pleadings and the claims of proof by the respective parties set forth in the findings are voluminous and somewhat complicated, but many of the potential questions presented or suggested thereby become, for practical purposes of the present appeal, immaterial or subsidiary; the ultimate and decisive questions as developed on the trial were whether the defendants wrongfully failed to sell the plaintiff’s land bank stocks when and as ordered by him, and whether their action in selling his Puget Sound Power & Light Company stock was wrongful, as the plaintiff claimed, or justified, as the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Silver v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Brennan v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Middendorf, Williams & Co. v. Alexander Milburn Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
- Strakosch v. Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Allen v. . McConiheNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vincent v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
- Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Robert Lawrence Associates, Inc. v. Del VecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Bridgeport Pipe Engineering Co. v. DeMatteo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Montanaro Bros. Builders, Inc. v. SnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.