Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Buckeye Savings & Loan Co.
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1930No. 6578, No. 6579, No. 6580, No. 6581PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Woods, Judge:
These four suits were instituted for tire purpose of removing clouds from and quieting titles to certain residential properties in the city of Clarksburg. The several appeals are prosecuted from decrees of the circuit court of Harrison county sustaining demurrers to and dismissing the bills filed herein. As the causes are similar, we will confine ourselves to the allegations of the McCue bill.
The bill, as amended, alleges in substance that one Iiornor and wife, on the 14th of September, 1920, obtained a loan of $6,000.00 from The Buckeye Savings & Loan Company, an Ohio…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tennant's Heirs v. FrettsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
- Gilbert v. McCrearyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
- Sanders v. . Village of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Whitehouse v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Smith v. O'KeefeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Hannah v. HeeterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- Nielson v. BentonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re West Virginia Asbestos LitigationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- Miners Sav. Bank of Pittston, Pa. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.