Legal Opinion
Simpson v. Bradley
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 14, 1939No. 12871PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
1. Whatever may be the rules and restrictions governing technical motions in arrest of judgment and motions to set aside judgments as to the time of filing (Code, §§ 110-702, 110-703, 3-702; Regopoulas v. State, 116 Ga. 596, 598, 42 S. E. 1014; Ford v. Clark, 129 Ga. 292, 58 S. E. 818; Moore v. Moore, 139 Ga. 597, 77 S. E. 820; Wright v. Martin, 153 Ga. 32, 35, 111 S. E. 190), it is nevertheless true that “in a proper proceeding with.rule nisi or process, and service upon the necessary parties, the courts of this State may exercise the jurisdiction, which obtained at common…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- New Zealand Fire Insurance v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Ford v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Regopoulas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Stoddard v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Union Compress Co. v. Leffler & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Siegel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Canal Insurance Co. v. CambronSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Southern Railway Co. v. Acme Fast Freight Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- The GREYHOUND CORPORATION v. CloughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.