Legal Opinion

Snowden v. Adams

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided September 1, 2011No. 08-3051PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 29) filed by Defendants Carol Adams, Grace Hou, Robert Kilbury, Kris Smith, Marjorie Olson, and Jane Breen. For the reasons that follow, the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendants Hou, Kilbury, Smith, Olson, and Breen. Summary judgment is denied as to Defendant Adams.

I. FACTS

In April 2005, Plaintiff Richard Snowden was hired as the Superintendent of the Illinois School for the Visually…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wood v. Peoria School District 150District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Jacquelyn Johnston v. Gary S. BordersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API