Legal Opinion
Gausvik v. Perez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 18, 2004No. 04-35130PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Circuit Judge:
Ralph Gausvik brought suit against Officer Robert Perez, alleging that the latter had violated his civil rights during a sexual abuse investigation. On September 16, 2002, the district court found that Perez was not entitled to summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity. On October 3, 2003, this court held that Perez did not violate any of Gausvik’s constitutional rights, reversed the judgment of the district court, and granted Perez qualified immunity. Gausvik v. Perez, 345 F.3d 813, 818 (9th Cir.2003).
In its original judgment, the district court also ruled that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Leslie D. COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Allen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Lawrence Kates v. Crocker National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Gausvik v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Jp Ex Rel. Balderas v. City of PortervilleDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- A.I.I.L. v. SessionsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- Bentley v. Arizona Department of Child SafetyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Burke v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2022
- Cooper v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.