Legal Opinion
Abendroth v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 26, 1985No. C6-84-1517PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
The parties executed an agreement stating that appellant had 55 percent loss of crops from hail. Based on evidence of the extent of damage, the trial court determined that appellant sustained hail damage of 2.5 percent to his crop. Appellant claims that the trial court was bound by the parties’ agreement.
FACTS
Francis Abendroth, now deceased, was a farmer in Wright County. On June 1, 1981, he purchased $17,500 of hail insurance from respondent insurance company for approximately 175 acres of soybeans located in Wright County.
Paragraph 2 of the Special Provisions section…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Toombs v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Evans v. BlesiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Lappinen v. Union Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Casey v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Service Oil, Inc. v. TriplettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. LitzauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Fette v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Estate of Whish v. BienfangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Abendroth v. NAT. FARMERS U. PROP. & CAS. CO.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.