State v. Litzau
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Robert A. Litzau appeals from a conviction of third-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.344(b) (1984), contending that the trial court erred in admitting stipulated polygraph test evidence. He also claims he was denied effective assistance of counsel and that the prosecutor’s remarks during closing argument denied him a fair trial. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
Appellant was arrested on May 20, 1984 and pleaded not guilty on June 18, 1984 to sexually abusing a young boy. In July 1984, Litzau agreed to take a polygraph examination.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. BarbaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. MartiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- State v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. StanislawskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. TorkelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. WinterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. SchaefferCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- State of Minnesota v. John Everette PierceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. SchaefferCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990