Legal Opinion

State v. Tilcock

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1975No. KCD 26882PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Judge.

Defendant appeals from a jury imposed sentence of seven years. He was charged with the sale of a quantity of amphetamine sulfate.

There is no issue as to the sufficiency of the evidence and the facts may be simply stated. A police officer assigned to narcotics and working under cover was informed by a trusted and reliable informant that the defendant would sell. The informant and the police officer went together to a tavern. The defendant waved to them, and they went to the bar where a short conversation occurred. The threesome then retired to a narrow hallway leading to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. RaspberrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. State v. NiehoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. State v. HubbleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. State v. WendellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. State v. PernellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. State v. RandallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. State v. MeekMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API