Legal Opinion

State v. Hubble

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1973No. 26241PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, hereinafter called “defendant”, appeals from his conviction of selling a quantity of amphetamine sulfate, a drug listed by the Missouri Division of Health to be a stimulant, with imposition of sentence suspended by the trial court and defendant placed on probation for two years.

Defendant asks this court to reverse his conviction because (1) he was denied his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation in that the trial court refused to compel the state to disclose the identity of an informer, (2) the state failed to prove that the Missouri Division of Health had not excepted amphetamine…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. State v. YatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. State v. ReddingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. State v. ZimpherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. State v. ArbeiterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. TilcockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. State v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API