Legal Opinion

Frankiewicz v. Konwinski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1929No. Docket No. 98, Calendar No. 34,117PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff filed bill for specific performance and had decree, from which defendants Konwinski have appealed.

Plaintiff, it is alleged, as assignee of the vendees Mr. and Mrs. Bobb in a land contract, owned a farm in Tuscola county, and chattels thereon. Both farm and chattels were mortgaged.

Appellants Konwinski, husband and wife, owned, subject to mortgage, a two-family dwelling, their home, in Wyandotte.

The parties agreed to exchange the properties, plaintiff’s to be subject to mortgages not exceeding $3,050, and appellants’ to be subject to mortgage of $1,800. A preliminary writing or option…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taft v. TaftMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hildebrand v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Chesebro v. . MoersNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Supple v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Noakes v. NoakesMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Smith v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Korolick v. DaneMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Slesinger v. WillekeMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Smith v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API